Minburi Criminal Court reads the verdict in the case of adverse possession of Aku townhouse. Four suspects for trespassing were sentenced to 6 months in prison, with a fine of 2,000 baht each, and for theft, with 1 year in prison and a fine of 20,000 baht each. The defendants pleaded guilty and their sentences were reduced in half. For trespassing, there would be 3 months in prison and a fine of 1,000 baht. For theft, there would be 6 months in jail and a fine of 10,000 baht. Total imprisonment for each person is 9 months and a fine of 11,000 baht. But all 4 defendants are of advanced age and are still working together to pay back 1,000 baht. million baht until the victims are satisfied I think I should give him a chance to become a good person. The prison sentence is suspended for 2 years. The court ruled in the case of hostile possession of the Aku townhouse. Revealed at the Minburi Criminal Court at 10:00 a.m. on May 7, the court ruled in the case of the Special Prosecutor of the Minburi Criminal Case Division 1, filing charges against Ms. Sriphan Samakkhi, Mrs. Nittaya Samakkhi, Phonlakrit Thongkham and Ms. Malee Kinnoi, a total of 4 people, are defendants in the offense of trespassing. Causing loss of property and theft in the case of trespassing at a townhouse of Mr. Hematat or Aku Prachayanusit, age 64, in Soi Ramintra 58 and claiming possession of the enemy as his own. Before moving out at the end of 2023, later illegally returned to claim hostile possession again. Agu then complained to the media and went to report the crime. Khok Kram Metropolitan Police Station prosecuted the case. The defendants were allowed to be released on bail in the amount of 50,000 baht each. Today, all 4 defendants along with their lawyers came to listen to the verdict. The court considered and found that between 2017 and 2023, all 4 defendants broke into houses. An incident occurred because he saw that no one was there Then add a residential building. But the plaintiff did not prove that Is there an invasion during the day or night? Therefore, it is necessary to listen to the defendant that It is a daytime invasion. and it was not an offense of continuous trespassing. The judge ruled that The defendant is guilty of an offense under Section 335 of the Criminal Code and Section 365 together with Section 83. The offense is a single act that violates many laws. The punishment for trespassing was 6 months imprisonment and a fine of 2,000 baht, and theft for 1 year imprisonment and a fine of 20,000 baht each. All 4 defendants pleaded guilty and their sentences were reduced in half. For trespassing, there would be 3 months in prison and a fine of 1,000 baht. For theft, there would be 6 months in jail and a fine of 10,000 baht. The total sentence for all 4 defendants would be 9 months in prison and a fine of 1,100,000 baht. Upon consideration, it is found that all 4 defendants are very old. Already And the defendants also jointly paid compensation of 1 million baht until the victims were satisfied. I think I should give him a chance to become a good person. The prison sentence was therefore suspended for 2 years. As for the charge of loss of property, which was a compromise case. The co-plaintiffs would like to withdraw the lawsuit and are not satisfied with the case after listening to the verdict. Ms. Amnuayphon Maneewan, Aku’s lawyer, said that today the court has ruled in favor of the victims in the case. Charged with trespassing and theft. The sentence was reduced to 9 months imprisonment and a fine of 11,000 baht. In the case of causing loss of property, the co-plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit. The court was merciful because it saw that Never committed a crime and the defendant is an elderly person. Therefore, the sentence will be suspended for 2 years. After this, the case will end up in the Court of First Instance because the victim does not want to take action. The defendant is now paying damages in respect of the hostile possession case in which the defense filed a withdrawal of the complaint earlier. Mr. Phakin or Sun Timkul, 27 years old, Aku’s nephew, traveled with Ms. Sarocha, wife of Ms. Rocha said that this story is a lesson for people who do things like this. What is illegal we should know There should be a punishment for interfering with other people’s things. I don’t want it to be seen as a normal thing in society. The reporter also reported that This case was after the investigating officer received a complaint that there were 5 accused persons in total, but after it became a social trend, Ms. Panumat or Nu Samakkhi, aged 52 years, was one of the accused at the time. Decided to hang himself inside house number 9/564 in Manthana village. Ramintra-Wongwaen Kanchanaphisek Road (parallel), Khwaeng and Khan Na Yao District, Bangkok, causing shock to General Krit Thongkham, whose husband is one of the four accused at the court’s sentencing today. All “Thairath newspaper columns” here
