It must be considered that Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai was more successful than expected in showing off his 10 year old rice diet in front of the media and people all over the country. Achieved the important objective of proving that 10-year rice from the pledging project that is still remaining Can be eaten and may be exported for sale, but those who see it call this show “Bhoomthamkarnlakorn” Mr. Rames Rattanachaweng, spokesman for the Democrat Party, suggested that if old rice that had been stuck in a warehouse for 10 years were brought to be sold in the market, it would damage the entire market. Including a rice and curry shop and recommended that it be brought to the Cabinet to eat every Tuesday when there is a meeting, but Senator Somchai Sawangkarn has serious criticism and suggestions stating that 10 year old rice has been fumigated with pesticides every 1–2 months for 10 years. No less than 60–120 times per year. Academics must be tested for the DNA of rice and stop selling it as food for people and animals. And banning exports will destroy the image of Thai rice. There are also critics that it is a 10-year drama about rice consumption. In addition to wanting to prove that “You can eat and sell” and may hope for deeper political results, such as wanting to prove that the rice pledging project is a pure and honest project, even though it has caused hundreds of billions in damages. and there were two ministers in prison, several high-ranking government officials and rice merchants. Must be sentenced by the Supreme Court’s Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions. Imprisoning each person for several decades for the crime of corruption in selling pawned rice. Even Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra received 5 years for neglecting corruption. But fled abroad after former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra was able to return to the country without spending a day in jail. News has been released that Ms. Yingluck May return to Thailand in October. The rice pledging case may be revived for consideration. It might start with proving the quality of the rice, or it might even go so far as to “broke it out” by issuing an amnesty law. The committee would pass an amnesty law. It washes away the guilt of the offender. According to the court judgment, there are currently several draft bills in parliament. But the argument is not finished yet. To baptize or not to baptize someone? The important lesson is that the Yingluck government has previously enacted amnesty at the end of the road. To purify the former prime minister who ended up in a coup. Click to read the column. More “editorial articles”
